1.Why include HTR in your methodology
Handwritten text recognition (HTR) has matured from an experimental technique into an established research method used across the humanities and social sciences. Hundreds of peer-reviewed publications now cite AI-assisted transcription as a core part of their workflow, and major funding bodies — including the ERC, DFG, NEH, AHRC, SNSF, and FWF — have awarded grants to projects that rely on it.
The methodological case for HTR rests on three pillars:
- Efficiency. Automated transcription processes pages in seconds rather than the 15–60 minutes required for manual transcription, making large-scale corpus work feasible within typical grant timelines.
- Reproducibility. A trained model produces identical output on the same input every time. This deterministic behaviour is a significant advantage over manual transcription, where inter-annotator agreement is imperfect.
- Measurability. Recognition quality is quantified using Character Error Rate (CER), an objective metric computed on held-out test data. This gives reviewers — and the research team — a concrete, verifiable quality indicator.
Including HTR in your methodology signals that your project leverages state-of-the-art digital methods while maintaining rigorous quality control. It also demonstrates awareness of scalability constraints that often concern reviewers evaluating large documentary corpora.